Correct Answer: B
Explanation:
There are two main issues in this question.
(1) the subject pronoun who in the phrase who many consider a leading contender should be the object pronoun whom since the Attorney is the object
(i.e., many [people] is the subject and the Attorney is the one being acted upon or considered).
(2) the sentence should use the idiom both x and y where x and y are parallel such that the sentence is structured as follows: is seen ...both x and y (i.e., both a savvy political maneuver and an abrogation of professional responsibility). The original version improperly states: is both seen...x and y
A. the object pronoun whom should replace the subject pronoun who; the idiom both x and y is not properly used
B. the object pronoun whom replaces the subject pronoun who; the idiom both x and yis properly used
C. the idiom both x and y is not properly used
D. the object pronoun whom should replace the subject pronoun who
E. the phrase whom is seen as a leading contender for a cabinet appointment is improper as there is nobody acting upon the object (represented by the object pronoun whom); the phrase is seen as a leading requires a subject (for the verb sand yet there is no subject, only an object)